Blogs (3) >>

Posters provide an opportunity for an informal presentation featuring “give and take” with conference attendees. Presenting a poster is a good way in which to discuss and receive feedback on work in progress that has not been fully developed into a paper. Posters should not be previously published, as a paper or a poster.

Any topic relevant to the conference focus areas is suitable for presentation as a poster. These include new results and insights around developing, implementing, or evaluating computing programs, curricula, and courses. However, the topic should lend itself to presentation in poster format with additional details available in a handout or web page. You might consider a poster presentation of teaching materials that you would like to share or preliminary research findings, such as:

  • imaginative assignments
  • innovative curriculum design
  • laboratory materials
  • effective ideas for recruiting and retaining students
  • pilot study completed
  • data collected, initial results
  • computing education research that is in a preliminary stage

Graduate or undergraduate students submitting posters may instead wish to submit to the ACM Student Research Competition (SRC) held at the SIGCSE Technical Symposium. Like normal posters, ACM SRC posters are displayed at the conference, but the top poster authors also present their work orally, may win prizes and proceed to the international ACM Student Research Competition. Authors should submit to only one of the two tracks (posters or SRC), not to both. Any submissions made to more than one track will be desk rejected from both tracks.

Authors submitting work to SIGCSE TS 2025 are responsible for complying with all applicable conference authorship policies and those articulated by ACM. If you have questions about any of these policies, please contact program@sigcse2025.sigcse.org for clarification prior to submission.

ACM has made a commitment to collect ORCiD IDs from all published authors (https://authors.acm.org/author-resources/orcid-faqs). All authors on each submission must have an ORCiD ID (https://orcid.org/register) in order to complete the submission process. Please make sure to get your ORCID ID in advance of submitting your work.

Presentation Modality

One author of each accepted poster submission must present their work in-person at the conference. There will be no remote poster presentations.

Dates

This program is tentative and subject to change.

You're viewing the program in a time zone which is different from your device's time zone change time zone

Thu 27 Feb

Displayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change

10:00 - 12:00
10:00
2h
Talk
Overcoming Illusionary Difficulty in Novice Programming through Metacognitive Skill Enhancement
Posters
Zhen Jiang West Chester University, Jie Wu Temple University, Nora Jiang Swarthmore College
10:00
2h
Talk
An Interactive Tool for Randomized Autogradable Graph Assessments
Posters
Eldar Hasanov UC Berkeley, Dev Ahluwalia University of California, Berkeley, Daniel Garcia University of California Berkeley, Narges Norouzi University of California, Berkeley, Armando Fox UC Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Comparing Students' and Teachers' Assessments of Office Hours
Posters
Zhikai Gao North Carolina State University, Saminur Islam North Carolina State University, Caleb Scott North Carolina State University, Collin Lynch North Carolina State University, Sarah Heckman North Carolina State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Simulating Requirement Elicitation: Development and Evaluation of a Persona-Based Tool
Posters
Ildar Akhmetov Northeastern University, Mirjana Prpa Northeastern University
10:00
2h
Talk
A Research-Oriented Course in Developing Tools to Teach AI
Posters
Fred Martin University of Texas at San Antonio, Deepti Tagare University of Texas at San Antonio, Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi University of Texas at San Antonio
10:00
2h
Talk
How Should We Measure Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Equity in Undergraduate CS Programs?MSI
Posters
Julie Smith Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Monica McGill Institute for Advancing Computing Education
10:00
2h
Talk
Managing Project Teams in an Online Class of 1000+ Students
Posters
Nazanin Tabatabaei Anaraki Georgia Institute of Technology, Taneisha Ng Georgia Institute of Technology, Gaurav Verma Georgia Institute of Technology, Yu Fu Georgia Institute of Technology, Martin Oconnell Georgia Institute of Technology, Matthew Hull Georgia Institute of Technology, Susanta Routray Georgia Institute of Technology, Max Mahdi Roozbahani Georgia Institute of Technology, Duen Horng Chau Georgia Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Personalized Parsons Puzzles as Scaffolding Enhance Practice Engagement Over Just Showing LLM-Powered Solutions
Posters
Xinying Hou University of Michigan, Zihan Wu University of Michigan, Xu Wang University of Michigan, Barbara Ericson University of Michigan
10:00
2h
Talk
How Good are Large Language Models at Generating Subgoal Labels?
Posters
Samiha Marwan University of Virginia, Mohamed Ibrahim Arab Academy for Science and Technology, Briana B. Morrison University of Virginia
10:00
2h
Talk
Teaching Sustainable Computing Through Repair: Case Studies on Curriculum Design
Posters
Esther Roorda University of British Columbia, Sathish Gopalakrishnan University of British Columbia, Emily Shilton University of British Columbia
10:00
2h
Talk
CS Student Reflections on Equity-Focused Classroom Practices
Posters
Nadia Najjar University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Debarati Basu Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Liam Custer University of North Carolina at Charlotte
10:00
2h
Talk
Scaffolding Collaborative Software Design with Serious Games
Posters
Serena Caraco University of California, Berkeley, Melissa Fabros University of California, Berkeley, Nelson Lojo University of California, Berkeley, Armando Fox UC Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Student Retention through Peer-led CS1 Review Sessions: Motivation, Sense of Belonging, and Learning Gains
Posters
Dee Weikle James Madison University, Michael Stewart James Madison University, A. Carter Gilbert James Madison University, Cory Longenecker James Madison University
10:00
2h
Talk
Exploring CS Education Policy Through the Lens of State Governance Models: Access, Accountability and Authority
Posters
Janice Mak Arizona State University, Carolina Torrejon Capurro Arizona State University, Megean Garvin UMBC
10:00
2h
Talk
Analyzing Computational Thinking Gameplay: Identifying Struggles and the Role of Experience
Posters
Sotheara Veng University of Delaware, Yifan Zhang University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ekaterina Bergwall University of Delaware, Teomara Rutherford University of Delaware
10:00
2h
Talk
Sociotechnical AI Education Course Design for CS Majors and Non-Majors
Posters
Sri Yash Tadimalla UNC Charlotte, Mary Lou Maher University of North Carolina
10:00
2h
Talk
Supporting Students at Scale: Profiling Student Behaviors on Usage and Impact of the Student Support System
Posters
Teresa Luo University of California, Berkeley, Chenkun Sheng University of California, Berkeley, Lisa Yan UC Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Checkpoint: A Tool for Supporting Terminal-Based Capture-the-Flag Assessments
Posters
Connor Bernard University of California, Berkeley, Melissa Fabros University of California, Berkeley, Zhifei Li Renmin University of China, Narges Norouzi University of California, Berkeley, Daniel Garcia University of California Berkeley, Armando Fox UC Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
How Do Learners Use Scratch Paper When Working On Dynamic Programming Problems?
Posters
Zihan Wu University of Michigan, Jonathan Liu University of Chicago, Erica Goodwin University of Chicago, Diana Franklin University of Chicago
10:00
2h
Talk
Reducing Isolation through Peer-Modeled Posts
Posters
Naaz Sibia University of Toronto Mississauga, Angela Zavaleta Bernuy University of Toronto, Amber Richardson University of Toronto Mississauga, Khushi Malik University of Toronto, Prajna Pendharkar University of Toronto Mississauga, Carolina Nobre University of Toronto, Michael Liut University of Toronto Mississauga, Andrew Petersen University of Toronto
10:00
2h
Talk
Assessing Course Policy Impacts: Late Course Enrollment and Its Effects on Student Performance and Incomplete Grades
Posters
Victoria Phelps University of California, Berkeley, Anneliese Galler UC Berkeley, Jordan Schwartz UC Berkeley, Stacey Yoo UC Berkeley, Aananya Lakhani UC Berkeley, Daniel Garcia University of California Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Three-stage Learning with Portable Online Hands-on Labware for Quantum-based Machine Learning Development
Posters
Yong Shi Kennesaw State University, Dan Lo Kennesaw State University, Hongmei Chi Florida A&M University, Andrew Polisetty Kennesaw State University, Kun Suo Kennesaw State University, Tu Nguyen Kennesaw State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Leveraging Various Social Media Platforms to Mentor Black Computing Students on Graduate School Opportunities
Posters
Kaylah Mackroy Morehouse College, Whitney Nelson Morehouse College, Kinnis Gosha Morehouse College
10:00
2h
Talk
Crafting Opportunities: Establishing a Micro-Internship Program for Computing Students
Posters
Nimmi Arunachalam Florida International University, Stephanie Lunn Florida International University, Ashmita Thapaliya Florida International University, Giri Narasimhan Florida International University, Jason Liu Florida International University, Mark Weiss Florida International University
10:00
2h
Talk
Co-designing Curriculum to Discuss Environmental Disparities Using Data Science
Posters
Dana Saito-Stehberger University of California, Irvine, Mark Warschauer University of California, Irvine
10:00
2h
Talk
No Average User: Covering Accessibility and Inclusion in an HCI Course
Posters
Andrea Salgian The College of New Jersey
10:00
2h
Talk
Broadening Participation in CS Research with Scalable Undergraduate Research Mini-Projects
Posters
Bridget Agyare UC Berkeley, Manooshree Patel UC Berkeley, Alicia Matsumoto UC Berkeley, Gireeja Ranade University of California, Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
An LLM-Based Framework for Simulating, Classifying, and Correcting Students’ Programming Knowledge with the SOLO Taxonomy
Posters
Shan Zhang University of Florida, Pragati Meshram University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Priyadharshini Ganapathy Prasad University of Florida, Maya Israel University of Florida, Suma Bhat University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
10:00
2h
Talk
Is ACM-W Still Relevant After 30 Years? Exploring the Ongoing Needs of Women and URMs in Computing
Posters
Shelly Engelman Custom EduEval LLC, Rachelle Hippler Baldwin Wallace University, Andrew Watkins Case Western Reserve University, Patricia Opong Columbus State Community College, Natalie Nurse Cuyahoga Community College, Dave Reed Creighton University
10:00
2h
Talk
A Systematic Literature Mapping of Early Generative AI Research is CS Education
Posters
Brian Harrington University of Toronto Scarborough, Ahmad Zubair Alnoor University of Toronto Scarborough, Pedram Haqiqi University of Toronto Scarborough, Zahra Hoseininia University of Toronto Scarborough, Kai Lin University of Toronto Scarborough, Maliha Lodi University of Toronto Scarborough, Asad Mirza University of Toronto Scarborough, Leah Wolfe University of Toronto Scarborough, Kevin Zhang University of Waterloo
10:00
2h
Talk
Designing Experiential Learning with Beehive Sensor Data into a Non-Relational Database Course
Posters
Dean Ganskop Rochester Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Self-Disclosure and Beyond: Takeaways from an Online and In-Person Computing Ethics Course
Posters
Helen Weixu Chen University of Waterloo, Maura R. Grossman University of Waterloo, Daniel G. Brown University of Waterloo
10:00
2h
Talk
Quack! Configuring Large Language Models to Serve as Rubber Duck Coding Assistants
Posters
Elias Gonzalez University of Maryland, Joel Chan University of Maryland, David Weintrop University of Maryland
10:00
2h
Talk
One-on-One Review Intervention for Students Struggling in Discrete Mathematics
Posters
Allie Pfleger University of Washington, Robbie Weber University of Washington
10:00
2h
Talk
Presenting Computing Accessibility Education Using Experiential Labs
Posters
Heather Moses Rochester Institute of Technology, Elaina Trapatsos Rochester Institute of Technology, Farzana Rahman Syracuse University, Samuel Malachowsky Rochester Institute of Technology, Daniel Krutz Rochester Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Persistence in and Change to Computing Majors among Students with Disabilities
Posters
Jinyoung Hur University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Michael Kang University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Kathryn Cunningham University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
10:00
2h
Talk
Assessing the Influence of ChatGPT on Student Outcomes in a Models of Computing Course
Posters
10:00
2h
Talk
Spotting AI Missteps: Students Take on LLM Errors in CS1
Posters
Samantha Smith UC Berkeley, Heather Wei University of California, Berkeley, Abby O'Neill University of California, Berkeley, Aneesh Durai UC Berkeley, John DeNero UC Berkeley, J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira UC Berkeley, Narges Norouzi University of California, Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
VRV: A Versatile RISC-V Simulator for Education
Posters
Noah Krim University of California, Davis, Joël Porquet-Lupine University of California, Davis
10:00
2h
Talk
Implementation of Technical Interviews as an Alternative Assessment in a Large Introductory CS Course
Posters
Giulia Alberini McGill University, Elena Bai McGill University
10:00
2h
Talk
Nudging the Field Towards Justice-Oriented Goals: Committing to CS Education
Posters
Alexis Cobo CSforALL, Aman Yadav Michigan State University

Fri 28 Feb

Displayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change

10:00 - 12:00
10:00
2h
Talk
Maine AI Arena
Posters
Zachary Hutchinson University of Maine, School of Computing and Information Science, Graham Berry University of Maine, School of Computing and Information Science, Henry Kindler University of Maine, School of Computing and Information Science
10:00
2h
Talk
Leveraging LLM for Detecting and Explaining LLM-generated Code in Python Programming Courses
Posters
Jeonghun Baek The University of Tokyo, Tetsuro Yamazaki The University of Tokyo, Akimasa Morihata The University of Tokyo, Junichiro Mori The University of Tokyo, Yoko Yamakata The University of Tokyo, Kenjiro Taura The University of Tokyo, Shigeru Chiba The University of Tokyo
10:00
2h
Talk
GraySim Virtual-Memory Page Replacement Simulation
Posters
Melinda Zhang U.S. Army, Maria R. Ebling United States Military Academy, West Point
10:00
2h
Talk
LLM-KCI: Leveraging Large Language Models to Identify Programming Knowledge Components
Posters
Rose Niousha University of California, Berkeley, Abby O'Neill University of California, Berkeley, Ethan Chen University of California, Berkeley, Vedansh Malhotra Stanford University, Bita Akram North Carolina State University, Narges Norouzi University of California, Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Broadening CS Research Opportunities for Online Graduate Students
Posters
Bobbie Eicher Georgia Institute of Technology, Alex Duncan Georgia Institute of Technology, Dante Ciolfi Georgia Institute of Technology, Maria Konte Georgia Institute of Technology, Nicholas Lytle Georgia Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Mining Hierarchies with Conviction: Constructing the CS1 Skill Hierarchy with Pairwise Comparisons over Skill Distributions
Posters
Dip Kiran Pradhan Newar Utah State University, Max Fowler University of Illinois, David Smith University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Seth Poulsen Utah State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Coding Pathfinder: A Platform for Creative, Self-Guided Mastery in Programming
Posters
Ishita Gupta Stanford University, Maya Bridgman Stanford University, Sierra Wang Stanford University, John C. Mitchell Stanford University
10:00
2h
Talk
Teacher Reviews of Block-Based Coding for K-12 ClassroomsK12
Posters
Joanne Barrett University of Florida, Michael Johnson University of Florida, Maya Israel University of Florida
10:00
2h
Talk
Finding Misleading Identifiers in Novice Code Using LLMs
Posters
Anna Rechtackova Masaryk University Brno, Alexandra Maximova Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Griffin Pitts University of Florida
10:00
2h
Talk
Assessing Elementary Teachers’ Knowledge of Integrated Computational ThinkingK12
Posters
Deepti Joshi The Citadel, Candace Joswick University of Texas at Arlington, Robin Jocius University of Texas - Arlington, Jennifer Albert The Citadel, Melanie Blanton The Citadel, Bob Petrulis EPRE Consulting, Trent Dawson University of Texas at Arlington
10:00
2h
Talk
Teaching Assistants' Experiences of and Opinions on CS Ethics
Posters
Grace Barkhuff Georgia Institute of Technology, Ian Pruitt Georgia State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Balanced Creative Coding for Motivation and Learning Transfer
Posters
Alejandro Lobo University of California, San Diego, Amy Eguchi University of California, San Diego, Robert Twomey UC San Diego, Ying Wu UC San Diego
10:00
2h
Talk
How Teachers Integrate Data Science into Their Instruction for Middle-Grades LearnersK12
Posters
Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi University of Texas at San Antonio, Marissa Munoz University of Texas at San Antonio, Fred Martin University of Texas at San Antonio
10:00
2h
Talk
Lightweight Social Computing Tools for Undergraduate Research Community Building
Posters
Noel Chacko Temple University, Hannah Nguyen Temple University, Sophie Chen Temple University, Stephen MacNeil Temple University
10:00
2h
Talk
Impact of Retake Policy on Student Performance in a CS0 Course with Mastery Learning
Posters
Elise Vambenepe UC Berkeley, Kerry Pan UC Berkeley, Aanvi Kothari UC Berkeley, Anneliese Galler UC Berkeley, Connor Bernard University of California, Berkeley, Daniel Garcia University of California Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Scope Rule Comprehension by Novice Python Programmers
Posters
Mark Holliday Western Carolina University
10:00
2h
Talk
SAFARI-P: Swahili-Focused Adaptive Framework for Accelerated Reinforcement in Intelligent Python Education
Posters
Vasu Jindal Columbia University
10:00
2h
Talk
"Like a GPS": Analyzing Middle School Student Responses to an Interactive Pathfinding ActivityK12
Posters
Claire Aguiar North Carolina State University, Dan Carpenter North Carolina State University, Jessica Vandenberg North Carolina State University, Alex Goslen North Carolina State University, Wookhee Min North Carolina State University, Veronica Catete North Carolina State University, Bradford Mott North Carolina State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Connecting Education and Fun: Using Turing Machine Games in Theory of Computation
Posters
Tammy Vandegrift University of Portland
10:00
2h
Talk
Learning Programming for Non-Native English-Speaking Students: Insight from Japanese StudentsGlobal
Posters
Niken Prasasti Martono Tokyo University of Science, Hayato Ohwada Tokyo University of Science
10:00
2h
Talk
Predicting Student Reasoning for Self-Reported Affect in Game-Based Learning Environments
Posters
Jordan Esiason North Carolina State University, Alex Goslen North Carolina State University, Andres Felipe Zambrano University of Pennsylvania, Nidhi Nasiar University of Pennsylvania, Stephen Hutt University of Denver, Jonathan Rowe North Carolina State University, Jaclyn Ocumpaugh University of Pennsylvania, Jessica Vandenberg North Carolina State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Novice Difficulties in Graph Layering for Algorithm Design
Posters
Hongxuan Chen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Katherine Braught University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Geoffrey Herman University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Jeff Erickson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
10:00
2h
Talk
Exploring the Impact of Unsupervised Clustering Methods in Systematic Literature Reviews
Posters
Emily Bolger Department of Computational Mathematics, Science, and Engineering; Michigan State University, Marcos Caballero Michigan State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Student and Teacher Perspectives on Requiring a Computer Science Course in High SchoolK12
Posters
Julie Smith Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Monica McGill Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Jacob Koressel Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA), Bryan Twarek Computer Science Teachers' Association
10:00
2h
Talk
Menagerie: A Dataset of Graded Programming AssignmentsGlobal
Posters
Marcus Messer King's College London, Neil Brown King's College London, Michael Kölling King's College London, Miaojing Shi Tongji University
10:00
2h
Talk
Investigating Autograder Usage in the Post- Pandemic and LLM Era
Posters
Jason Weber University of California, Irvine, Hyunjun Park University of California, Irvine, Daniel J Song University of California, Irvine, Jared Apillanes University of California, Irvine, Barbara Martinez Neda University of California, Irvine, Jennifer Wong-Ma University of California, Irvine, Sergio Gago-Masague University of California, Irvine
10:00
2h
Talk
Mathematics for Machine Learning: A Bridge Course
Posters
Samuel Deng Columbia University
10:00
2h
Talk
The Effects of Game-Based Learning on STEM Career Awareness for Elementary Aged GirlsK12
Posters
Abi Olukeye University Of North Carolina at Charlotte, Nisaa Kirtman Rockman et al Cooperative, Adam Moylan Rockman et al Cooperative
10:00
2h
Talk
Predicting Students’ Interest from Small Group Conversational Characteristics: Insights from an AI Literacy Education with High School StudentsK12
Posters
Shenghua Zha University of South Alabama, Lujie Karen Chen University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Woei Hung University of North Dakota, Na Gong University of South Alabama, Pamela Moore University of South Alabama, Bethany Klemetsrud University of North Dakota
10:00
2h
Talk
Challenging the Status Quo in a Computing Ethics Course, One Water Cooler Conversation at a Time
Posters
Su Min Park University of California, Berkeley, Carol Li University of California, Berkeley, Jedidiah Tsang University of California, Berkeley, Lisa Yan UC Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Dynamic, Randomizable, Autogradable Visual Programming Simulations for Python Using Prairielearn
Posters
Noemi Chulo UC Berkeley, Gabriel Classon UC Berkeley, Ashley Chiu UC Berkeley, Daniel Garcia University of California Berkeley, Armando Fox UC Berkeley, Narges Norouzi University of California, Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
What Could Impact Indigenous-serving Teachers’ Computing Integration After A Culturally Responsive Professional Development?MSIK12
Posters
Wei Yan Northern Arizona University, Ashish Amresh Northern Arizona University, Jeffrey Hovermill Northern Arizona University, Paige Prescott Computer science alliance
10:00
2h
Talk
Design of a User Study to evaluate the effectiveness of a Software Security Module for Neurodivergent Students
Posters
Sushma Indrani Dangeti University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Harini Ramaprasad UNC Charlotte, Meera Sridhar University of North Carolina Charlotte, USA, Soham Pradhan University of North Carolina at Charlotte
10:00
2h
Talk
Design Principles for CT Integrated Lesson Design and Implementation
Posters
Merijke Coenraad Digital Promise, Kyle Dunbar Digital Promise Global, Alessandra Rangel Digital Promise, Wanjoo Ahn Michigan State University, Aman Yadav Michigan State University, Sharin Jacob Digital Promise
10:00
2h
Talk
Praxly: An Online IDE for the Praxis CS Test PseudocodeK12
Posters
Benjamin Saupp James Madison University, Ellona Macmillan James Madison University, Chris Mayfield James Madison University, Chris Johnson James Madison University, Michael Stewart James Madison University, Shelita Hodges Richmond Public Schools
10:00
2h
Talk
Streamlining Web Development Education: The Impact and Implementation of the ECS-WL Website
Posters
Samuel Mazzone Marquette University, Dennis Brylow Marquette University
10:00
2h
Talk
The AI-Enhanced Software Engineer: A Snapshot of the Profession
Posters
Irene Lee Education Development Center, Joyce Malyn Smith Education Development Center, Matthew Kam Google, Cody Miller Google, Miaoxin Wang Trilyon
10:00
2h
Talk
Innovative Approaches to Information Communication Technology and Development (ICTD) Course Design
Posters
Susan Wyche Michigan State University, Osafenwen Diawara Michigan State University
10:00
2h
Talk
RAFIKI: Leveraging Large Language Models to Increase AP Computer Science A Enrollment among Disadvantaged High School FemalesK12
Posters
Ryka Chopra Mission San Jose High School, Suparna Chakraborty University of San Francisco
10:00
2h
Talk
Undergraduate Research Opportunities in CS Education: A Literature Map
Posters
Brian Harrington University of Toronto Scarborough, Shreeansha Bhattarai University of Toronto Scarborough, Han-Shin Chen University of Toronto Scarborough, Yuxin Chen University of Toronto Scarborough, Kian Dianati University of Toronto Scarborough, Serena Ju University of Toronto Scarborough, Yuhan Pan University of Toronto Scarborough, Zhiyu Pan University of Toronto Scarborough, Neha Prabu University of Toronto Scarborough, Zhifei Song , Like Wang University of Toronto Scarborough
10:00
2h
Talk
Simulating Real IT Project Life for Students – The StudyTalk Case StudyGlobal
Posters
Anna Pakosch Hochschule Hannover, Dennis Allerkamp Hochschule Hannover – University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Arne Koschel Hochschule Hannover
10:00
2h
Talk
Conceptualizing the Support and Learning of K-2 Educators around Artificial Intelligence in Language ArtsK12
Posters
Jessica Vandenberg North Carolina State University, Ryan Torbey American Institutes for Research, Cecilia Xuning Zhang American Institutes for Research, Bradford Mott North Carolina State University, Keisha Bailey American Institutes for Research, Joseph Wilson American Institutes for Research
10:00
2h
Talk
The Development and Validation of the Critical Reflection and Agency in Computing Scale
Posters
Aadarsh Padiyath University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, Mark Guzdial University of Michigan, Barbara Ericson University of Michigan
10:00
2h
Talk
Implementing the AI-Lab Framework: Enhancing Introductory Programming Education for CS Majors
Posters
Ethan Dickey Purdue University, Andres Mauricio Bejarano Posada Purdue University, Rhianna Setsma Purdue University
15:00 - 17:00
15:00
2h
Talk
Student Usage of Metacognition-Promoting Tool in a CS2 Course and its Relationship with Performance
Posters
Jiaen Yu University of California, San Diego, Anshul Shah University of California, San Diego, John Driscoll University of California, San Diego, Yandong Xiang University of California, San Diego, Xingyin Xu University of California, San Diego, Sophia Krause-Levy University of San Diego, Soohyun Liao University of California in San Diego
15:00
2h
Talk
From Typing to Insights: An Interactive Code Visualization for Enhanced Student Support Using Keystroke Data
Posters
Friday James Kansas State University, Russell Feldhausen Kansas State University, Nathan H. Bean Kansas State University, Joshua Weese Kansas State University, David Allen Kansas State University, Michelle Friend University of Nebraska Omaha
15:00
2h
Talk
Crafting for Career Agility: An Outcome-Based Redesign of a Machine Learning Curriculum within a Program Bundle
Posters
En-Shiun Annie Lee University of Toronto, Sean Woodhead York University, Karthik Kuber York University, Hashmat Rohian York University, Stacey Koornneef University of Ontario Institute of Technology
15:00
2h
Talk
Facilitators and Barriers for Integrating Technology Education into K-5 ClassroomsK12
Posters
Miriam Jacobson The University of Texas at Austin, Zhuoying Wang The University of Texas at Austin, Yiwen Yang The University of Texas at Austin, Karanjot Kaur The University of Texas at Austin
15:00
2h
Talk
What CS Teachers Want in a CS Professional Development Passport
Posters
Joseph Tise Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Laycee Thigpen Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Monica McGill Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Robert Schwarzhaupt American Institutes for Research
15:00
2h
Talk
ChartCode: A Flowchart-Based Tool for Introductory Programming Courses
Posters
Guangming Xing Western Kentucky University, Tawfiq Salem Purdue University, Gongbo Liang Texas A & M University - San Antonio
15:00
2h
Talk
Detecting Programming Plans in Open-ended Code Submissions
Posters
Mehmet Arif Demirtas University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Claire Zheng University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Kathryn Cunningham University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
15:00
2h
Talk
Collaborative CS Professional Development Across Three Cohorts
Posters
Jina Wilde University of Texas at San Antonio, Michael Zawatski University of Texas at San Antonio, Darean Wilde University of Texas at San Antonio
15:00
2h
Talk
Exploring LLMs Impact on Student-Created User Stories and Acceptance Testing in Software Development
Posters
Allan Brockenbrough Salem State University, Henry Feild Endicott College, Dominic Salinas Salem State University
15:00
2h
Talk
Cultivating Sense of Belonging in Computing Education: Identifying Servingness Traits Among Community College PopulationCC
Posters
Christian Servin El Paso Community College, Brett Becker University College Dublin, Emiliano Garcia El Paso Community College
15:00
2h
Talk
Experiences teaching a course on Algorithms, Ethics, and Society
Posters
Nicole Eikmeier Grinnell College, Leah Perlmutter Grinnell College
15:00
2h
Talk
The Role of Virtual Reality in Enhancing Computer Science Education
Posters
Zubair Zabir Rollins College, Sirazum Munira Tisha Rollins College
15:00
2h
Talk
Using Peer Tutoring to Bolster Retention Rates and Student Performance in CS1 courses
Posters
Sharanya Jayaraman Florida State University, Ameya Kolarkar Florida State University
15:00
2h
Talk
On a Time Crunch: Examining Learning Outcomes Within a One Unit Computing Ethics Course
Posters
Jedidiah Tsang University of California, Berkeley, Carol Li University of California, Berkeley, Su Min Park University of California, Berkeley, Lisa Yan UC Berkeley
15:00
2h
Talk
Describing the Experience of Instructional Coaches in Supporting Elementary Coding
Posters
Peter Rich Brigham Young University, Heather Cunningham Boot Up Professional Development, Lien Diaz BootUp PD
15:00
2h
Talk
Hacking Student Leadership: Peer Mentorship and Leadership Skill Development Among Hackathon Organizers
Posters
Kush Patel Temple University, Andrew Tran Temple University, Christine Kapp Temple University, Daniel Bicalho Temple University, Yatri Patel Temple University, Chiku Okechukwu Temple University, Egi Rama Temple University, Stephen MacNeil Temple University
15:00
2h
Talk
Empowering CS1 Educators: Enhancing Automated Feedback Instruction with Cognitive Load Theory
Posters
15:00
2h
Talk
Iterative Development of an Evaluative Checklist for Integrated Computer Science Lessons in K-8K12
Posters
Justin Cannady University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
15:00
2h
Talk
Computer Science Faculty Perspectives on Undergraduate Student Mental Health
Posters
Christian Murphy Swarthmore College, Van Nguyen Bryn Mawr College, Asli Yuksel Swarthmore College, Sahasra Nandela Green Hope High School
15:00
2h
Talk
Day of AI Australia: Teacher Insights from a Nation-Wide AI Literacy Program for K-12 StudentsK12
Posters
Natasha Banks Day of AI Australia, Jake Renzella University of New South Wales, Sydney
15:00
2h
Talk
Raising the Bar: Automating Consistent and Equitable Student Support with LLMs
Posters
Meenakshi Mittal UC Berkeley, Azalea Bailey UC Berkeley, Victoria Phelps University of California, Berkeley, Mihran Miroyan UC Berkeley, Chancharik Mitra University of California, Berkeley, Rishi Jain UC Berkeley, Rose Niousha University of California, Berkeley, Gireeja Vishnu Ranade UC Berkeley, Narges Norouzi University of California, Berkeley
15:00
2h
Talk
Ethics in Motion Interactive Software for Ethical Decision-Making in Autonomous Vehicles
Posters
Tony Krystofiak College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University, Anna Byron College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University, Peter Ohmann College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, Heather Amthauer College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University
15:00
2h
Talk
An Undergraduate Course on Computer Architecture
Posters
Przemyslaw Nowak Lodz University of Technology, Dariusz Puchala Lodz University of Technology, Kamil Stokfiszewski Lodz University of Technology
15:00
2h
Talk
Using LLMs to Detect the Presence of Learning Outcomes in Submitted Work Within Computing Ethics Courses
Posters
Jedidiah Tsang University of California, Berkeley, Carol Li University of California, Berkeley, Su Min Park University of California, Berkeley, Lisa Yan UC Berkeley
15:00
2h
Talk
Scaling Academic Decision-Making with NLP: Automating Transfer Credit Evaluations
Posters
Nimisha Roy Georgia Institute of Technology, Fisayo Omojokun Georgia Institute of Technology, Huaijin Tu Georgia Institute of Technology
15:00
2h
Talk
The Evolving Usage of GenAI by Computing Students
Posters
Irene Hou Temple University, Hannah Nguyen Temple University, Owen Man Temple University, Stephen MacNeil Temple University
15:00
2h
Talk
Rightsizing: Understanding Novice, Casual Learners of Programming
Posters
Gabriela Ciolacu Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Christian Haas University of Nebraska at Omaha, Margeret Hall University of Nebraska at Omaha
15:00
2h
Talk
Generating AI Literacy MCQs: A Multi-Agent LLM Approach
Posters
Jiayi Wang Northwestern University, Ruiwei Xiao Carnegie Mellon University, Ying Jui Tseng Carnegie Mellon University
15:00
2h
Talk
EclipseMonitor: A Real-Time Student Programming Environment Data Collection Tool
Posters
Saminur Islam North Carolina State University, Zhikai Gao North Carolina State University, John Bacher North Carolina State University, Gabriel Silva de Oliveira North Carolina State University, Varad Patwardhan North Carolina State University, Sarah Heckman North Carolina State University, Collin Lynch North Carolina State University
15:00
2h
Talk
Pencil Puzzles as a Context in Upper-level Core Computing Courses at Multiple Institutions
Posters
Angelina Brilliantova Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), Asya Vitko Rochester Institute of Technology, Ivona Bezakova Rochester Institute of Technology, Zack Butler Rochester Institute of Technology
15:00
2h
Talk
Evaluating GenAI’s Effectiveness for Students with Varied Programming Backgrounds in a Software Development Course
Posters
Houda Bouamor Carnegie Mellon University, Gabriela Gongora-Svartzman Northeastern University, Larry Heimann Carnegie Mellon University, Shihong Huang Carnegie Mellon University
15:00
2h
Talk
Scaffolding Mock Conference Projects in Theory of Computing Courses
Posters
Ryan Dougherty United States Military Academy
15:00
2h
Talk
Enabling Professional Growth and Identity of High School CS Teachers through One-on-One CoachingK12
Posters
Jennifer Rosato University of Minnesota, Fatima Brunson Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Joseph Tise Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Laycee Thigpen Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Monica McGill Institute for Advancing Computing Education
15:00
2h
Talk
Designing an Multi-Modal Community for Black Undergraduate Women in Computing at a Predominantly-White UniversityMSI
Posters
Luce-Melissa Kouaho University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Noah Q. Cowit University of Colorado, Boulder, Dr. Marlon Mejias University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Rest Johnson University of North Carolina at Charlotte
15:00
2h
Talk
A Scaffolding-based Approach for Addressing Challenges of Service Learning Adoption
Posters
Stan Kurkovsky Central Connecticut State University, Michael Goldweber Xavier University, Chad Williams Central Connecticut State University, Nathan Sommer Xavier University
15:00
2h
Talk
Exploring K-12 In-Service Teachers’ Process of Plan Monitor Evaluation in Java programming. K12
Posters
Latoya Chandler University of Florida, Rui Huang University of Florida, Maya Israel University of Florida, Priyadharshini Ganapathy Prasad University of Florida
15:00
2h
Talk
Introducing Theoretical Computer Science in High School Physics Courses from Impossibility and Undecidability ProblemsGlobalK12
Posters
Rafael del Vado Vírseda Universidad Complutense de Madrid
15:00
2h
Talk
Glitch Defense: A Computer Game to Teach Cybersecurity Concepts and Broaden Participation in Computing
Posters
Julio Bahamon UNC Charlotte, Hallie Johnson UNC Charlotte
15:00
2h
Talk
Snapgram: matrix multiplications made fun
Posters
Joël Porquet-Lupine University of California, Davis
15:00
2h
Talk
Collaborative design of a week-long physiological computing summer camp with elementary teachersK12
Posters
Feiya Luo , Amy Hutchison University of Alabama, Chris Crawford University of Alabama, Fatema Nasrin University of Alabama, Idowu David Awoyemi University of Alabama
15:00
2h
Talk
Examining Student Interest and Motivations in Graduate Computer Science Research
Posters
Bobbie Eicher Georgia Institute of Technology, Alex Duncan Georgia Institute of Technology, Dante Ciolfi Georgia Institute of Technology, Maria Konte Georgia Institute of Technology, Nicholas Lytle Georgia Institute of Technology

Sat 1 Mar

Displayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change

10:00 - 12:00
10:00
2h
Talk
AutoRemind: Improving Student Academic Performance Through a Personalized and Automated Notification System
Posters
Oindree Chatterjee University of California, Berkeley, Ankita Sundar University of California, Berkeley, Arihant Choudhary University of California Berkeley, Connor Bernard University of California, Berkeley, Daniel Garcia University of California Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
ToolName: Defining Coding Katas using a Single Jupyter Notebook
Posters
Zachary Kurmas Grand Valley State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Uncovering Opportunities for K-12 CS Professional Development in West African Schools.GlobalK12
Posters
Jane Awuah GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Judith Uchidiuno Georgia Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Characteristics and Effectiveness of Cheat Sheets for a Third-year Computer Graphics and Image Processing CourseGlobal
Posters
Burkhard Wünsche University of Auckland, Dominik Lange-Nawka University of Auckland, Zixuan Wang University of Auckland, Steffan Hooper University of Auckland, Samuel E. R. Thompson University of Cambridge, Haoran Feng University of Auckland
10:00
2h
Talk
Towards a Quantum-Resistant Future: Experiences in Post-Quantum Cryptography Education
Posters
Thomas J. Borrelli Rochester Institute of Technology, Sumita Mishra Rochester Institute of Technology, Monika Polak University of Rochester, Stanislaw Radziszowski Rochester Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Creating a Joint-Faculty Artificial Intelligence Concentration within a Graduate Program
Posters
En-Shiun Annie Lee University of Toronto, Arvind Gupta University of Toronto, Amane Takeuchi University of Toronto, Stacey Koornneef University of Ontario Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Integrating Computational Thinking, Project-Based Learning, and Cultural Heritage for Rural Middle School StudentsK12
Posters
Kyle Dunbar Digital Promise Global, Merijke Coenraad Digital Promise, Emi Iwatani Digital Promise
10:00
2h
Talk
GradeSync: a Tool for Automating Incomplete Processing to Support Mastery Learning
Posters
Manan Bhargava University of California, Berkeley, Mehul Ajay Gandhi University of California, Berkeley, Eemon Qayumi University of California, Berkeley, Victoria Phelps University of California, Berkeley, Zixuan Zhuang University of California, Berkeley, Naveen Nathan University of California, Berkeley, Connor Bernard University of California, Berkeley, Daniel Garcia University of California Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Designing for 5th Grader Sports and Computing ExperiencesK12
Posters
Pipob Puthipiroj Northwestern University, Ashley Quiterio Northwestern University
10:00
2h
Talk
TheoryViz: A Visualizer Tool for Theory of Computing Concepts
Posters
Lillian Baker United States Military Academy, Sierra Zoe Bennett-Manke United States Military Academy, Sebastian Neumann United States Military Academy, Ian Njuguna United States Military Academy, Ryan Dougherty United States Military Academy
10:00
2h
Talk
Piloting Intergenerational Participatory Design with Students & Teachers to develop Integrated K-8 CS Learning ExperiencesK12
Posters
Jean Salac Carleton College, Justin Cannady University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
10:00
2h
Talk
Impact of Gender on OSS File Contributions
Posters
Leilani Torres The College of Wooster, Heather Guarnera The College of Wooster, Michael L. Collard The University of Akron, Amber Garcia The College of Wooster
10:00
2h
Talk
Engaging K-12 Learners in Data Annotation for AI Climate ModelsK12
Posters
Michael MacFerrin University of Colorado Boulder, Edward Boyda Earth Genome, Kimberly Young Earth Genome, Josephine Namayanja University of Maryland Baltimore County, Aneesh Subramanian University of Colorado Boulder, Mohamed Mokbel University of Minnesota, Lujie Karen Chen University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Vandana P. Janeja University of Maryland, Baltimore County
10:00
2h
Talk
International Mobility for PhD Students: Key LearningsGlobal
Posters
Cecilia O. Alm Rochester Institute of Technology, Reynold Bailey Rochester Institute of Technology, Sarah Jane Delany Technological University Dublin, Georgiana Ifrim University College Dublin, Brian Mac Namee University College Dublin, Esa Rantanen Rochester Institute of Technology, Ferat Sahin Rochester Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Introducing Reinforcement Learning Concepts to Middle School Students with Game-Based LearningK12
Posters
Matthew Presson North Carolina State University, Anisha Gupta North Carolina State University, Jessica Vandenberg North Carolina State University, Alex Goslen North Carolina State University, Wookhee Min North Carolina State University, Veronica Catete North Carolina State University, Bradford Mott North Carolina State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Untangling School Leaders’ Perception of AI Integration in K-12 EducationK12
Posters
Yingxiao Qian University of South Carolina, Hengtao Tang University of South Carolina
10:00
2h
Talk
Intersectional Identities of Asian Americans Living with Mental Health Conditions in Computer Science Education
Posters
Mei Prasetio Swarthmore College, Christian Murphy Swarthmore College
10:00
2h
Talk
ChatGPT Comes to Campus: Unveiling Core Themes in AI Policies Across U.S. Universities with Large Language Models
Posters
Charles Alba Washington University in St Louis, Wang Xi Washington University in St Louis, Chenyu Wang Washington University in St Louis, Ruopeng An New York University
10:00
2h
Talk
Scalable Small-Group CS Tutoring System with AI
Posters
Yoonseok Yang Pensieve, Jack Liu Pensieve, J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira UC Berkeley, John DeNero UC Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Computer Science Behind Bars: Lessons Learned from Teaching Incarcerated Students in Prisons and Jails
Posters
Andrew Fishberg MIT, Marisa Gaetz MIT, Martin Nisser University of Washington, Carole Cafferty MIT, Lee Perlman MIT, Raechel N. Soicher MIT, Joshua Long University of Massachusetts, Lowell
10:00
2h
Talk
Bridging Simulation and Hardware: A Holistic Platform for Teaching in Computer Architecture and Operating Systems
Posters
Changzhong Qian University of Southern California, Siyu Chen University of Southern California, Andrew Goodney University of Southern California
10:00
2h
Talk
CSEdD: CS Eduation Dashboard for Student Success, Retention, and Performance Investigations
Posters
Mackenzie Creamer Northeastern University, Penny Rheingans University of Maine
10:00
2h
Talk
Understanding the Effects of Integrating Music Programming and Web Development in a Summer Camp for High School StudentsK12
Posters
Daniel Manesh Virginia Tech, Andrew Jelson Virginia Tech, Emily Altland Virginia Tech, Jason Freeman Georgia Tech, Sang Won Lee Virginia Tech
10:00
2h
Talk
Exploration of Undergraduate Teaching Assistant Identity and Teaching Goals in Data Science Courses
Posters
Krina Patel University of California, Berkeley, Abigail Brooks-Ramirez University of California, Berkeley, Rebecca Dang University of California, Berkeley, Bryan Ventura University of California, Berkeley, Lisa Yan UC Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
A Blueprint for Q-CS1, an Introductory Quantum Programming Course
Posters
Austin J. Adams Georgia Institute of Technology, Rodrigo Borela Georgia Institute of Technology, Jeffrey Young Georgia Institute of Technology, Thomas Conte Georgia Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Designing Tangible Coding Blocks and Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking to Children with Autism Spectrum DisorderGlobal
Posters
Sukanya Roychowdhury Department of Computer Science & Information Systems (CS&IS), BITS Pilani , K K Birla Goa Campus, Swaroop Joshi BITS Pilani KK Birla Goa Campus
10:00
2h
Talk
From Code to Concepts: Textbook-Driven Knowledge Tracing with LLMs in CS1
Posters
Abby O'Neill University of California, Berkeley, Samantha Smith UC Berkeley, Aneesh Durai UC Berkeley, John DeNero UC Berkeley, J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira UC Berkeley, Narges Norouzi University of California, Berkeley
10:00
2h
Talk
Evaluating Students’ Experience in High School CS Education: A CAPE Framework-Based ApproachK12
Posters
Manee Ngozi M Nnamani Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Josh Sheldon Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Teaching Systems Lab, Deborah Boisvert CSforMA, Inc., Justin Reich Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Teaching Systems Lab
10:00
2h
Talk
A SWOT Analysis of How a Research Practice Partnership Builds Trust and Cultivates Partnership Relationships
Posters
Laycee Thigpen Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Monica McGill Institute for Advancing Computing Education
10:00
2h
Talk
Portable Pedagogy: Teaching Computer Science Across Institutions
Posters
Lauren Herckis CGFNS International, Inc. and Carnegie Mellon University (On Leave), Judeth Oden Choi Carnegie Mellon University
10:00
2h
Talk
GRADE: Grading and Assessment of Database ER Diagrams
Posters
Eldon Williams Gatton Academy, Western Kentucky University, Guangming Xing Western Kentucky University
10:00
2h
Talk
School Implementation Planning for Equitable AP CSPK12
Posters
Julie K. Zeringue Education Development Center, Jane Kang Education Development Center, Deborah Spencer Education Development Center, Kelsey Klein Education Development Center, June Mark Education Development Center
10:00
2h
Talk
An IoT Sensing After-School Program - Impacts on Belonging and Confidence in Middle School StudentsK12
Posters
Brian Krupp Case Western Reserve University, Jonathon Fagert Baldwin Wallace University
10:00
2h
Talk
An Analysis of K-12 Programming Education Utilizing the Minecraft Metaverse Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
Posters
Chiyoko Sawada Keio University, Masafumi Terazono Keio Research Lab at SFC
10:00
2h
Talk
A Multi-modal Understanding of Emotions and Cognitive Engagement of Students during a Programming Task
Posters
Rakhi The Ohio State University, Trebor Shankle The Ohio State University, Zahra Atiq The Ohio State University
10:00
2h
Talk
Exploring ChatGPT as a Qualitative Research Assistant
Posters
Angelina Brilliantova Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), Zack Butler Rochester Institute of Technology, Ivona Bezakova Rochester Institute of Technology
10:00
2h
Talk
Does ABET Accreditation Influence the Representation of Women in CS Programs?
Posters
Stefanie Colino Dube Northeastern University, Albert Lionelle Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University
10:00
2h
Talk
Teaching Algorithms to Indigenous Students of Brazil's AmazonGlobal
Posters
Maristela Holanda Universidade de Brasília, Edison Ishikawa Universidade de Brasília, Dilma Da Silva Texas A&M
10:00
2h
Talk
Traversing New Horizons: An Exploration of Educational Policies on Generative AI
Posters
Kerrie Hooper Florida International University, Stephanie Lunn Florida International University
10:00
2h
Talk
Developing a National Longitudinal Study on 6th-12th Grade Students' Motivation and Persistence in ComputingK12
Posters
Monica McGill Institute for Advancing Computing Education, Joseph Tise Institute for Advancing Computing Education
10:00
2h
Talk
What Gets Them Talking? Identifying Catalysts for Student Engagement Within a Computing Ethics Course
Posters
Carol Li University of California, Berkeley, Su Min Park University of California, Berkeley, Jedidiah Tsang University of California, Berkeley, Lisa Yan UC Berkeley

Accepted Submissions

Title
A Blueprint for Q-CS1, an Introductory Quantum Programming Course
Posters
A Multi-modal Understanding of Emotions and Cognitive Engagement of Students during a Programming Task
Posters
Analyzing Computational Thinking Gameplay: Identifying Struggles and the Role of Experience
Posters
An Analysis of K-12 Programming Education Utilizing the Minecraft Metaverse Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
Posters
An Interactive Tool for Randomized Autogradable Graph Assessments
Posters
An IoT Sensing After-School Program - Impacts on Belonging and Confidence in Middle School StudentsK12
Posters
An LLM-Based Framework for Simulating, Classifying, and Correcting Students’ Programming Knowledge with the SOLO Taxonomy
Posters
An Undergraduate Course on Computer Architecture
Posters
A Research-Oriented Course in Developing Tools to Teach AI
Posters
A Scaffolding-based Approach for Addressing Challenges of Service Learning Adoption
Posters
Assessing Course Policy Impacts: Late Course Enrollment and Its Effects on Student Performance and Incomplete Grades
Posters
Assessing Elementary Teachers’ Knowledge of Integrated Computational ThinkingK12
Posters
Assessing the Influence of ChatGPT on Student Outcomes in a Models of Computing Course
Posters
A SWOT Analysis of How a Research Practice Partnership Builds Trust and Cultivates Partnership Relationships
Posters
A Systematic Literature Mapping of Early Generative AI Research is CS Education
Posters
AutoRemind: Improving Student Academic Performance Through a Personalized and Automated Notification System
Posters
Balanced Creative Coding for Motivation and Learning Transfer
Posters
Bridging Simulation and Hardware: A Holistic Platform for Teaching in Computer Architecture and Operating Systems
Posters
Broadening CS Research Opportunities for Online Graduate Students
Posters
Broadening Participation in CS Research with Scalable Undergraduate Research Mini-Projects
Posters
Challenging the Status Quo in a Computing Ethics Course, One Water Cooler Conversation at a Time
Posters
Characteristics and Effectiveness of Cheat Sheets for a Third-year Computer Graphics and Image Processing CourseGlobal
Posters
ChartCode: A Flowchart-Based Tool for Introductory Programming Courses
Posters
ChatGPT Comes to Campus: Unveiling Core Themes in AI Policies Across U.S. Universities with Large Language Models
Posters
Checkpoint: A Tool for Supporting Terminal-Based Capture-the-Flag Assessments
Posters
Co-designing Curriculum to Discuss Environmental Disparities Using Data Science
Posters
Coding Pathfinder: A Platform for Creative, Self-Guided Mastery in Programming
Posters
Collaborative CS Professional Development Across Three Cohorts
Posters
Collaborative design of a week-long physiological computing summer camp with elementary teachersK12
Posters
Comparing Students' and Teachers' Assessments of Office Hours
Posters
Computer Science Behind Bars: Lessons Learned from Teaching Incarcerated Students in Prisons and Jails
Posters
Computer Science Faculty Perspectives on Undergraduate Student Mental Health
Posters
Conceptualizing the Support and Learning of K-2 Educators around Artificial Intelligence in Language ArtsK12
Posters
Connecting Education and Fun: Using Turing Machine Games in Theory of Computation
Posters
Crafting for Career Agility: An Outcome-Based Redesign of a Machine Learning Curriculum within a Program Bundle
Posters
Crafting Opportunities: Establishing a Micro-Internship Program for Computing Students
Posters
Creating a Joint-Faculty Artificial Intelligence Concentration within a Graduate Program
Posters
CSEdD: CS Eduation Dashboard for Student Success, Retention, and Performance Investigations
Posters
CS Student Reflections on Equity-Focused Classroom Practices
Posters
Cultivating Sense of Belonging in Computing Education: Identifying Servingness Traits Among Community College PopulationCC
Posters
Day of AI Australia: Teacher Insights from a Nation-Wide AI Literacy Program for K-12 StudentsK12
Posters
Describing the Experience of Instructional Coaches in Supporting Elementary Coding
Posters
Designing an Multi-Modal Community for Black Undergraduate Women in Computing at a Predominantly-White UniversityMSI
Posters
Designing Experiential Learning with Beehive Sensor Data into a Non-Relational Database Course
Posters
Designing for 5th Grader Sports and Computing ExperiencesK12
Posters
Designing Tangible Coding Blocks and Tools for Teaching Computational Thinking to Children with Autism Spectrum DisorderGlobal
Posters
Design of a User Study to evaluate the effectiveness of a Software Security Module for Neurodivergent Students
Posters
Design Principles for CT Integrated Lesson Design and Implementation
Posters
Detecting Programming Plans in Open-ended Code Submissions
Posters
Developing a National Longitudinal Study on 6th-12th Grade Students' Motivation and Persistence in ComputingK12
Posters
Does ABET Accreditation Influence the Representation of Women in CS Programs?
Posters
Dynamic, Randomizable, Autogradable Visual Programming Simulations for Python Using Prairielearn
Posters
EclipseMonitor: A Real-Time Student Programming Environment Data Collection Tool
Posters
Empowering CS1 Educators: Enhancing Automated Feedback Instruction with Cognitive Load Theory
Posters
Enabling Professional Growth and Identity of High School CS Teachers through One-on-One CoachingK12
Posters
Engaging K-12 Learners in Data Annotation for AI Climate ModelsK12
Posters
Ethics in Motion Interactive Software for Ethical Decision-Making in Autonomous Vehicles
Posters
Evaluating GenAI’s Effectiveness for Students with Varied Programming Backgrounds in a Software Development Course
Posters
Evaluating Students’ Experience in High School CS Education: A CAPE Framework-Based ApproachK12
Posters
Examining Student Interest and Motivations in Graduate Computer Science Research
Posters
Experiences teaching a course on Algorithms, Ethics, and Society
Posters
Exploration of Undergraduate Teaching Assistant Identity and Teaching Goals in Data Science Courses
Posters
Exploring ChatGPT as a Qualitative Research Assistant
Posters
Exploring CS Education Policy Through the Lens of State Governance Models: Access, Accountability and Authority
Posters
Exploring K-12 In-Service Teachers’ Process of Plan Monitor Evaluation in Java programming. K12
Posters
Exploring LLMs Impact on Student-Created User Stories and Acceptance Testing in Software Development
Posters
Exploring the Impact of Unsupervised Clustering Methods in Systematic Literature Reviews
Posters
Facilitators and Barriers for Integrating Technology Education into K-5 ClassroomsK12
Posters
Finding Misleading Identifiers in Novice Code Using LLMs
Posters
From Code to Concepts: Textbook-Driven Knowledge Tracing with LLMs in CS1
Posters
From Typing to Insights: An Interactive Code Visualization for Enhanced Student Support Using Keystroke Data
Posters
Generating AI Literacy MCQs: A Multi-Agent LLM Approach
Posters
Glitch Defense: A Computer Game to Teach Cybersecurity Concepts and Broaden Participation in Computing
Posters
GRADE: Grading and Assessment of Database ER Diagrams
Posters
GradeSync: a Tool for Automating Incomplete Processing to Support Mastery Learning
Posters
GraySim Virtual-Memory Page Replacement Simulation
Posters
Hacking Student Leadership: Peer Mentorship and Leadership Skill Development Among Hackathon Organizers
Posters
How Do Learners Use Scratch Paper When Working On Dynamic Programming Problems?
Posters
How Good are Large Language Models at Generating Subgoal Labels?
Posters
How Should We Measure Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Equity in Undergraduate CS Programs?MSI
Posters
How Teachers Integrate Data Science into Their Instruction for Middle-Grades LearnersK12
Posters
Impact of Gender on OSS File Contributions
Posters
Impact of Retake Policy on Student Performance in a CS0 Course with Mastery Learning
Posters
Implementation of Technical Interviews as an Alternative Assessment in a Large Introductory CS Course
Posters
Implementing the AI-Lab Framework: Enhancing Introductory Programming Education for CS Majors
Posters
Innovative Approaches to Information Communication Technology and Development (ICTD) Course Design
Posters
Integrating Computational Thinking, Project-Based Learning, and Cultural Heritage for Rural Middle School StudentsK12
Posters
International Mobility for PhD Students: Key LearningsGlobal
Posters
Intersectional Identities of Asian Americans Living with Mental Health Conditions in Computer Science Education
Posters
Introducing Reinforcement Learning Concepts to Middle School Students with Game-Based LearningK12
Posters
Introducing Theoretical Computer Science in High School Physics Courses from Impossibility and Undecidability ProblemsGlobalK12
Posters
Investigating Autograder Usage in the Post- Pandemic and LLM Era
Posters
Is ACM-W Still Relevant After 30 Years? Exploring the Ongoing Needs of Women and URMs in Computing
Posters
Iterative Development of an Evaluative Checklist for Integrated Computer Science Lessons in K-8K12
Posters
Learning Programming for Non-Native English-Speaking Students: Insight from Japanese StudentsGlobal
Posters
Leveraging LLM for Detecting and Explaining LLM-generated Code in Python Programming Courses
Posters
Leveraging Various Social Media Platforms to Mentor Black Computing Students on Graduate School Opportunities
Posters
Lightweight Social Computing Tools for Undergraduate Research Community Building
Posters
"Like a GPS": Analyzing Middle School Student Responses to an Interactive Pathfinding ActivityK12
Posters
LLM-KCI: Leveraging Large Language Models to Identify Programming Knowledge Components
Posters
Maine AI Arena
Posters
Managing Project Teams in an Online Class of 1000+ Students
Posters
Mathematics for Machine Learning: A Bridge Course
Posters
Menagerie: A Dataset of Graded Programming AssignmentsGlobal
Posters
Mining Hierarchies with Conviction: Constructing the CS1 Skill Hierarchy with Pairwise Comparisons over Skill Distributions
Posters
No Average User: Covering Accessibility and Inclusion in an HCI Course
Posters
Novice Difficulties in Graph Layering for Algorithm Design
Posters
Nudging the Field Towards Justice-Oriented Goals: Committing to CS Education
Posters
On a Time Crunch: Examining Learning Outcomes Within a One Unit Computing Ethics Course
Posters
One-on-One Review Intervention for Students Struggling in Discrete Mathematics
Posters
Overcoming Illusionary Difficulty in Novice Programming through Metacognitive Skill Enhancement
Posters
Pencil Puzzles as a Context in Upper-level Core Computing Courses at Multiple Institutions
Posters
Persistence in and Change to Computing Majors among Students with Disabilities
Posters
Personalized Parsons Puzzles as Scaffolding Enhance Practice Engagement Over Just Showing LLM-Powered Solutions
Posters
Piloting Intergenerational Participatory Design with Students & Teachers to develop Integrated K-8 CS Learning ExperiencesK12
Posters
Portable Pedagogy: Teaching Computer Science Across Institutions
Posters
Praxly: An Online IDE for the Praxis CS Test PseudocodeK12
Posters
Predicting Student Reasoning for Self-Reported Affect in Game-Based Learning Environments
Posters
Predicting Students’ Interest from Small Group Conversational Characteristics: Insights from an AI Literacy Education with High School StudentsK12
Posters
Presenting Computing Accessibility Education Using Experiential Labs
Posters
Quack! Configuring Large Language Models to Serve as Rubber Duck Coding Assistants
Posters
RAFIKI: Leveraging Large Language Models to Increase AP Computer Science A Enrollment among Disadvantaged High School FemalesK12
Posters
Raising the Bar: Automating Consistent and Equitable Student Support with LLMs
Posters
Reducing Isolation through Peer-Modeled Posts
Posters
Rightsizing: Understanding Novice, Casual Learners of Programming
Posters
SAFARI-P: Swahili-Focused Adaptive Framework for Accelerated Reinforcement in Intelligent Python Education
Posters
Scaffolding Collaborative Software Design with Serious Games
Posters
Scaffolding Mock Conference Projects in Theory of Computing Courses
Posters
Scalable Small-Group CS Tutoring System with AI
Posters
Scaling Academic Decision-Making with NLP: Automating Transfer Credit Evaluations
Posters
School Implementation Planning for Equitable AP CSPK12
Posters
Scope Rule Comprehension by Novice Python Programmers
Posters
Self-Disclosure and Beyond: Takeaways from an Online and In-Person Computing Ethics Course
Posters
Simulating Real IT Project Life for Students – The StudyTalk Case StudyGlobal
Posters
Simulating Requirement Elicitation: Development and Evaluation of a Persona-Based Tool
Posters
Snapgram: matrix multiplications made fun
Posters
Sociotechnical AI Education Course Design for CS Majors and Non-Majors
Posters
Spotting AI Missteps: Students Take on LLM Errors in CS1
Posters
Streamlining Web Development Education: The Impact and Implementation of the ECS-WL Website
Posters
Student and Teacher Perspectives on Requiring a Computer Science Course in High SchoolK12
Posters
Student Retention through Peer-led CS1 Review Sessions: Motivation, Sense of Belonging, and Learning Gains
Posters
Student Usage of Metacognition-Promoting Tool in a CS2 Course and its Relationship with Performance
Posters
Supporting Students at Scale: Profiling Student Behaviors on Usage and Impact of the Student Support System
Posters
Teacher Reviews of Block-Based Coding for K-12 ClassroomsK12
Posters
Teaching Algorithms to Indigenous Students of Brazil's AmazonGlobal
Posters
Teaching Assistants' Experiences of and Opinions on CS Ethics
Posters
Teaching Sustainable Computing Through Repair: Case Studies on Curriculum Design
Posters
The AI-Enhanced Software Engineer: A Snapshot of the Profession
Posters
The Development and Validation of the Critical Reflection and Agency in Computing Scale
Posters
The Effects of Game-Based Learning on STEM Career Awareness for Elementary Aged GirlsK12
Posters
The Evolving Usage of GenAI by Computing Students
Posters
TheoryViz: A Visualizer Tool for Theory of Computing Concepts
Posters
The Role of Virtual Reality in Enhancing Computer Science Education
Posters
Three-stage Learning with Portable Online Hands-on Labware for Quantum-based Machine Learning Development
Posters
ToolName: Defining Coding Katas using a Single Jupyter Notebook
Posters
Towards a Quantum-Resistant Future: Experiences in Post-Quantum Cryptography Education
Posters
Traversing New Horizons: An Exploration of Educational Policies on Generative AI
Posters
Uncovering Opportunities for K-12 CS Professional Development in West African Schools.GlobalK12
Posters
Undergraduate Research Opportunities in CS Education: A Literature Map
Posters
Understanding the Effects of Integrating Music Programming and Web Development in a Summer Camp for High School StudentsK12
Posters
Untangling School Leaders’ Perception of AI Integration in K-12 EducationK12
Posters
Using LLMs to Detect the Presence of Learning Outcomes in Submitted Work Within Computing Ethics Courses
Posters
Using Peer Tutoring to Bolster Retention Rates and Student Performance in CS1 courses
Posters
VRV: A Versatile RISC-V Simulator for Education
Posters
What Could Impact Indigenous-serving Teachers’ Computing Integration After A Culturally Responsive Professional Development?MSIK12
Posters
What CS Teachers Want in a CS Professional Development Passport
Posters
What Gets Them Talking? Identifying Catalysts for Student Engagement Within a Computing Ethics Course
Posters

Deadlines and Submission

Poster submissions consist of a 2-page extended abstract about the work including a 250-word short abstract, additional content about the work, and references. You will not submit the actual PDF of the poster itself for review.

Poster submissions to the SIGCSE TS 2025 must be made through EasyChair no later than Monday, 14 October 2024. The track chairs reserve the right to desk reject submissions that are incomplete after the deadline has passed.

Important Dates

Due Date Monday, 14 October 2024
Due Time 23:59 AoE (Anywhere on Earth, UTC-12h)
Submission Limits 2 pages
Notification to Authors    Monday, 18 November 2024 tentative
Submission Link https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=sigcsets2025
Session Duration 2 hours

Poster submissions can be up 2-pages long and must include: a 250-word short abstract, additional content about the work, and references.

Authors may find it useful to read the Instruction for Reviewers and the Review Form to understand how their submissions will be reviewed. Also note that when submitting, you will need to provide between 3-7 related topics from the Topics list under Info.

Abstracts

All poster submissions must have a plain-text abstract of up to 250 words. Abstracts should not contain subheadings or citations. The abstract should be submitted in EasyChair along with the submission metadata, and it should be included in the PDF version of the submission at the appropriate location.

Submission Templates

All poster submissions must be in English and formatted using the 2-column ACM SIG Conference Proceedings format and US letter size pages (8.5x11 inch or 215.9 x 279.4mm).

Here is a Sample Poster Submission, which is formatted using this template with optional line numbers. It also has some notes/tips and shows the required sections.

Page Limits: Poster submissions are limited to a maximum of 2 pages of content (including all titles, author information, abstract, main text, tables and illustrations, acknowledgements, supplemental material, and references).

MS Word Authors: Please use the interim Word template provided by ACM.

LaTeX Authors:

Requirements for Double Anonymous Review Process: At the time of submission all entries should include blank space for all anonymous author information (or anonymized author name, institution, and email address), followed by an abstract, body content, and references. For anonymized submissions, all blank space necessary for all author information should be reserved under the Title, or fully anonymized text can take its place (i.e. one block per author, with four lines for name, institution, address, and email; not more than three columns of blocks). In addition, please leave enough blank space for what you intend to include for Acknowledgements but do not include the text, especially names and granting agencies and grant numbers.

Other requirements: Include space for authors’ e-mail addresses on separate lines. Even if multiple authors have the same affiliation, grouping authors’ names or e-mail addresses, or providing an ‘e-mail alias’ is not acceptable, e.g., {anon1,anon2,anon3}@university.edu or firstname.lastname@college.org. NOTE: Poster submissions may omit the following sections from the standard ACM template: keywords, CCS Concepts. Update since 2024: Because Poster submissions are 2-pages long this year, they should include BOTH the ACM Copyright Block and the ACM Reference Format.

Desk rejects: Submissions that do not adhere to page limits or formatting requirements will be desk rejected without review.

Accessibility: SIGCSE TS 2025 authors are strongly encouraged to prepare submissions using these templates in such a manner that the content is widely accessible to potential reviewers, track chairs, and readers. Please see these resources for preparing an accessible submission.

Double Anonymized Review

Authors must submit ONLY an anonymized version of the submission. The goal of the anonymized version is to, as much as possible, provide the author(s) of the submission with an unbiased review. The anonymized version should have ALL mentions of the authors removed (including author’s names and affiliation plus identifying information within the body of the submission such as websites or related publications). However, authors are reminded to leave sufficient space in the submitted manuscripts to accommodate author information either at the beginning or end of the submission. LaTeX/Overleaf users are welcome to use the anonymous option, but are reminded that sufficient room must exist in the submission to include all author blocks when that option is removed. Authors may choose to use placeholder text in the author information block, but we encourage authors to use obviously anonymized placeholders like “Author 1”, “Affiliation 1”, etc.

Self-citations need not be removed if they are worded so that the reviewer doesn’t know if the writer is citing themselves. That is, instead of writing “We reported on our first experiment in 2017 in a previous paper [1]”, the writer might write “In 2017, an initial experiment was done in this area as reported in [1].

Submissions to the poster track are reviewed with the dual-anonymous review process. The reviewers are unaware of the author identities, and reviewers are anonymous to each other and to the authors.

The reviewing process includes a discussion phase after initial reviews have been posted. During this time, the reviewers can examine all reviews and privately discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the work in an anonymous manner through EasyChair. This discussion information can be used by the track chairs in addition to the content of the review in making final acceptance decisions.

The SIGCSE TS 2025 review process does not have a rebuttal period for authors to respond to comments, and all acceptance decisions are final.

ACM Policies

By submitting your article to an ACM Publication, you are hereby acknowledging that you and your co-authors are subject to all ACM Publications Policies, including ACM’s new Publications Policy on Research Involving Human Participants and Subjects (https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/research-involving-human-participants-and-subjects). Alleged violations of this policy or any ACM Publications Policy will be investigated by ACM and may result in a full retraction of your paper, in addition to other potential penalties, as per ACM Publications Policy. See also the authorship policies.

ACM has made a commitment to collect ORCiD IDs from all published authors (https://authors.acm.org/author-resources/orcid-faqs). All authors on each submission must have an ORCiD ID (https://orcid.org/register) in order to complete the submission process. Please make sure to get your ORCID ID in advance of submitting your work.

Additional details are in the instructions for authors.

Getting ready

  • Make sure that all authors have obtained an ORCiD identifier. These identifiers are required for paper submission.
  • Check the author list carefully now and review with your co-authors. The authors on the submission must be the same as the authors on the final version of the work (assuming the work is accepted). Authors may not be added or removed after submission and must also appear in the same order as in the submission.
  • Identify at least one author who is willing to review for the symposium. Have that author or those authors sign up to review at https://tinyurl.com/review-sigcse25. (If they’ve done so already, there is no need to fill out the form a second time.) Researchers listed as co-authors on three or more submissions must volunteer to review. (Undergraduate co-authors are exempt from this requirement.)
  • Download an appropriate template. (see Instructions for Authors)
  • Review Additional Format Instructions in Instructions for Authors Tab- be sure you have included all required items.
  • Review the additional resources.
  • Review the instructions for reviewers and the Review Form to see what reviewers will be looking for in your paper.
  • Look at the list of topics in the Info menu on this site or on EasyChair and pick 3-7 appropriate topics for your submission.
  • Look at the EasyChair submission page to make sure you’ll be prepared to fill everything out. Note that you are permitted to update your submission until the deadline, so it is fine to put draft information there as you get ready.
  • IMPORTANT: no author names should be added to the PDF of your submission as the review process is double-anonymous.

The submission on EasyChair

Note: EasyChair does not let you save incomplete submission forms. Please fill out all of the fields in one sitting and save them. After that, you can continue to update the information in the fields and your submission until the deadline.

  • Use an appropriate template.
  • Ensure that your submission is accessible. See accessibility tips for authors for further details.
  • Ensure that your submission does not exceed the page limit.
  • For the double anonymous review process, ensure that your submission contains no author names or affiliations, but that you have left space for them, as per the instructions for authors.
  • The authors list in the EasyChair submission form should match exactly what you plan the non-anonymized author list to be in your camera-ready final submission (if the submission is accepted). Author lists can NOT be modified (this includes add/remove/reorder)
  • Submit the final version by 11:59 p.m. AOE, Monday, 14 October 2024.

What Gets Published?

The full 2-page extended abstract for each accepted poster will be published in the SIGCSE TS 2025 proceedings.

Presentation Details

By SIGCSE policy, at least one author of an accepted poster is required to register, attend, and present the work. SIGCSE TS 2025 posters will be presented only in-person.

Please print your poster in advance and bring it with you to the conference. The poster board size is 4 foot tall by 8 foot wide (48in x 96in), so a standard 36" by 48” poster would work well. Please arrive 15-20 minutes before your session to get set up. Each poster station will have push pins available. Please take down and remove your poster at the end of the session. At least one of the Poster Track Co-Chairs will be present at each session.

Suggestions for poster design are given in Creating Effective Academic Posters (UC Davis) and Research Posters 101 (ACM Crossroads article). While both of these references provide suggestions for student researchers, the ideas are also applicable to posters for this conference.

For samples of accepted posters, see prior SIGCSE TS proceedings. For example, posters for SIGCSE TS 2023 may be found at https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3545947#heading9 and a sample poster from that list can be found at https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3545947.3576292.

Sample Poster Submission

Here’s a Sample Poster Submission with Notes that is in the correct format and has additional notes about what is required.

Language Editing Assistance

ACM has partnered with International Science Editing (ISE) to provide language editing services to ACM authors. ISE offers a comprehensive range of services for authors including standard and premium English language editing, as well as illustration and translation services. Editing services are at author expense and do not guarantee publication of a manuscript.

Reviewing Phase Start Date End Date
Reviewing Thursday, 17 October 2024   Thursday, 31 October 2024
Discussion & Recommendations   Friday, 1 November 2024   Friday, 8 November 2024

Table of Contents

Overview

Posters provide an opportunity for an informal presentation featuring “give and take” with conference attendees. Presenting a poster is also a good way in which to discuss and receive feedback on work in progress that has not been fully developed into a paper. Posters should not be previously published (neither as a paper nor as a poster).

Poster submissions will be reviewed using the dual-anonymous review process (see below).

Submission and Review System

The review process for SIGCSE TS 2025 will be done using the EasyChair submission system (https://easychair.org/my/conference?conf=sigcsets2025). Reviewers will be invited to join/login into EasyChair, update their profile, and select 3-5 topics that they are most qualified to review. To do so, reviewers select SIGCSE TS 2025 > Conference > My topics from the menu and select at most 5 topics. More topics make it harder for the EasyChair system to make a good set of matches. Reviewers also identify their Conflicts of Interest by selecting SIGCSE TS 2025 > Conference > My Conflicts.

Dual-Anonymous Review Process

Authors must submit ONLY an anonymized version of the submission. The goal of the anonymized version is to, as much as possible, provide the author(s) of the submission with an unbiased review. The anonymized version should have ALL mentions of the authors removed (including author’s names and affiliation plus identifying information within the body of the submission such as websites or related publications). However, authors are reminded to leave sufficient space in the submitted manuscripts to accommodate author information either at the beginning or end of the submission. LaTeX/Overleaf users are welcome to use the anonymous option, but are reminded that sufficient room must exist in the submission to include all author blocks when that option is removed. Authors may choose to use placeholder text in the author information block, but we encourage authors to use obviously anonymized placeholders like “Author 1”, “Affiliation 1”, etc.

Self-citations need not be removed if they are worded so that the reviewer doesn’t know if the writer is citing themselves. That is, instead of writing “We reported on our first experiment in 2017 in a previous paper [1]”, the writer might write “In 2017, an initial experiment was done in this area as reported in [1].

Submissions to the Posters track are reviewed with the dual-anonymous review process. The reviewers are unaware of the author identities, and reviewers are anonymous to each other and to the authors.

The reviewing process includes a discussion phase after initial reviews have been posted. During this time, the reviewers can examine all reviews and privately discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the work in an anonymous manner through EasyChair. An Associate Program Chair (APC) will help move the discussion forward. This discussion information can be used by the Track Chairs in addition to the content of the review in making final decisions.

The SIGCSE TS 2025 review process does not have a rebuttal period for authors to respond to comments, and all acceptance decisions are final.

Getting Started Reviewing

Before starting your review, you may be asked by the Track Chairs to declare conflicts with any submitting authors. Please do so in a timely manner so we can avoid conflicts during assignment.

As a Reviewer, we ask that you carefully read each submission assigned to you and write a constructive review that concisely summarizes what you believe the submission to be about. When reviewing a submission, consider:

  • the strengths and weaknesses,
  • the contribution to an outstanding SIGCSE TS 2025 program and experience for attendees, and
  • how it brings new ideas or extends current ideas through replication to the field and to practitioners and researchers of computing education.

Poster Review Guidelines

Keep in mind that posters are meant to be a place to present and receive feedback on work that is in progress. Please provide constructive feedback and clearly justify your choice of rating to help the authors. A review that gives a low score with no written comments is not helpful to the authors since it simply tells the authors that they have been unsuccessful, with no indication of how or why.

Reviewers will be asked to summarize the work; provide their familiarity with the submission topic; evaluate the contribution, background and relation work, approach and uniqueness, and results and conclusions; provide written comments including strengths and weaknesses of the submissions; and provide an overall evaluation.

We strongly recommend that you prepare your review in a separate document; EasyChair has been known to time out.

While your review text should clearly support your scores and recommendation, please do not include your preference for acceptance or rejection of a submission in the feedback to the authors. Instead, use the provided radio buttons to make a recommendation (the authors will not see this) based on your summary review and provide any details that refer to your recommendation directly in the confidential comments to the APC or Track Chairs. Remember that as a reviewer, you will only see a small portion of the submissions, so one that you recommend for acceptance may be rejected when considering the other reviewer recommendations and the full set of submissions.

Poster Review Process Steps

Step 1: Authors submit Posters

As indicated in the Instructions for Authors, submissions are supposed to be sufficiently anonymous so that the reviewer cannot determine the identity or affiliation of the authors. The main purpose of the anonymous reviewing process is to reduce the influence of potential (positive or negative) biases on reviewers’ assessments. You should be able to review the work without knowing the authors or their affiliations. Do not try to find out the identity of authors. When in doubt, please contact the Track Chairs.

Step 2: Reviewers and APCs Submit Topics and Conflicts

Reviewers and APCs select topics they feel most qualified to review. This helps the system prioritize posters for review assignment. Reviewers and APCs enter conflicts. Note that these steps MUST be completed for the Poster Track even if they were already completed for another track. The topics and conflicts do not propagate across tracks.

Step 3: Track Chairs Decide on Desk Rejects

The Track Chairs will quickly review each poster submission to determine whether it violates anonymization requirements, formatting requirements, or length restrictions. Authors of desk-rejected posters will be notified immediately. The Track Chairs may not catch every issue. If you see something during the review process that you believe should be desk rejected, contact the Track Chairs at posters@sigcse2025.sigcse.org before you write a review. The Track Chairs, in consultation with the Program Chairs, will make the final judgment about whether something is a violation, and give you guidance on whether and if so how to write a review. Note that Track Chairs with conflicts of interest are excluded from deciding on desk-rejected posters, leaving the decision to the other Track Chair.

Step 4: Track Chairs Assign Reviewers and APCs

The Track Chairs will collaboratively assign at least three Reviewers and one APC for each poster submission. The Track Chairs will be advised by the submission system assignment algorithm. Reviewing assignments can only be made by a Track Chair without a conflict of interest.

Step 5a: Reviewers Review Posters

Assigned Reviewers submit their anonymous reviews by the review deadline, reviewing each of their assigned submissions against the Poster Reviewing Guidelines. We strongly recommend that you prepare your rationale in a separate document; EasyChair has been known to time out. Note that Reviewers must NOT include accept or reject decisions in their review text. (They will indicate accept/reject recommendations separately.)

Due to the internal and external (publication) deadlines, we generally cannot give reviewers or APCs extensions. Note that reviewers, APCs, and Track Chairs with conflicts cannot see any of the reviews of the posters for which they have conflicts of interest during this process.

Step 5b: APCs and Track Chairs Monitor Review Progress

APCs and Track Chairs periodically check in to ensure that progress is being made. If needed, Track Chairs send email reminders to the reviewers with the expectations and timelines. If needed, the Program Chairs and Track Chairs recruit emergency reviewers if any of the submissions do not have a sufficient number of reviews, if there is lots of variability in the reviews, or if an expert review is needed.

Step 6: Discussion between Reviewers and APCs

The discussion period provides the opportunity for the Reviewers and the APCs to discuss the reviews and reach an agreement on the quality of the submission relative to the expectations for the track to which it was submitted. The APCs are expected to take a leadership role and moderate the discussion. Reviewers are expected to engage in the discussion when prompted by other Reviewers and/or by the APCs by using the Comments feature of EasyChair.

During the discussion period, Reviewers are able to revise their reviews but are NOT required to do so. It is important that at no point Reviewers feel forced to change their reviews, scores, or viewpoints in this process. The APC can disagree with the reviewers and communicate this to the Track Chairs if needed. Everyone is asked to do the following:

  • Read all the reviews of all posters assigned (and re-read your own reviews).
  • Engage in a discussion about sources of disagreement.
  • Use the Poster Reviewing Guidelines to guide your discussions.
  • Be polite, friendly, and constructive at all times.
  • Be responsive and react as soon as new information comes in.
  • Remain open to other reviewers shifting your judgments.
  • Explicitly state any clarifying questions that could change your evaluation of the poster

Step 7: Track Chairs & Program Chairs Make Decisions & Notify Authors

The Track Chairs go through all the submissions and read all the reviews to ensure clarity and as much consistency with the review process and its criteria as possible. APCs are consulted if needed. Poster submissions do not receive meta-reviews in general, but in a small number of cases Track Chairs may write brief meta-reviews to share their interpretation of reviews. The Track Chairs make recommendations to the Program Chairs based on the reviews and their own expertise as well as a desire to provide an appropriately varied program. The Program Chairs then make final decisions and notify all authors of the decisions about their posters via the submission system.

Step 8: Evaluation

The Evaluation Chairs send out surveys to authors, reviewers, and APCs. Please take the time to respond to these surveys, as they inform processes and policies for future SIGCSE Technical Symposia. The Track Chairs also request feedback from the APCs on the quality of reviews as a metric to be used for future invitations to review for the SIGCSE Technical Symposium.

Discussion

The discussion and recommendation period provides the opportunity for the Track Chairs to discuss reviews and feedback so they can provide the best recommendation for acceptance or rejection to the Program Chairs and that the submission is given full consideration in the review process. We ask that Reviewers engage in discussion when prompted by other reviewers, the APC, or the Track Chairs by using the Comments feature of EasyChair. During this period you will be able to revise your review based on the discussion, but you are not required to do so.

The Track Chairs will make a final recommendation to the Program Chairs from your feedback.

Recalcitrant Reviewers

Reviewers who don’t submit reviews, have reviews with limited constructive feedback, do not engage effectively in the discussion phase, or submit inappropriate reviews will be removed from the reviewer list (as per SIGCSE policy). Recalcitrant reviewers will be informed of their removal from the reviewer list. Reviewers with repeated offenses (two within a three-year period) will be removed from SIGCSE reviewing for three years.

The following text represents the review form.

Summary: Please provide a brief summary of the submission, its audience, and its main point(s).

Familiarity: Rate your personal familiarity with the topic area of this submission in relation to your research or practical experience.

The contribution is clearly described: Select your rating.

Background and Related Work: Please rate the background and related work of this poster submission.

Approach and Uniqueness: Please rate the approach and uniqueness of this poster submission.

Results and Contribution: Please rate the results and contribution of this poster submission.

Overall evaluation: Please provide a detailed justification that includes constructive feedback that summarizes the strengths & weaknesses of the submission and clarifies your scores. Both the score and the review text are required, but remember that the authors will not see the overall recommendation score (only your review text). You should NOT directly include your preference for acceptance or rejection in your review.